A method as easy as genial to do, using
the analogy to a lie-detector.
Whereas a lie-detector
is using a very fine amount of electricity on humans, on water
this is not very efficient.
For that, water is too fine a conductor.
Sound does find a good enough resistitivity in water.
So, the graph building up does show a significant
difference between normal water and activated water.
Just see the difference of the first graph to the second (higher
and more pointed in first than second).
The results we find in our second graph we got simply by putting
the AQUALITE to the water for about 20 minutes without removing
it from the apparatures.
The second picture resembles now the results
we find when measuring wells well acknowleged for their capacity
of healing.
But, personally we were as happy about these
results because water we got for this first measurement was
treated by a water activator built by another institute …..!
